Active games

Start new game and compete for FIDE Online and Worldchess rating, or invite a friend and train with no hassle at all!
Switch to light theme
Notifications
No notifications

0

Sign in
Register
World of chess
Learning chess
Top players
Broadcasting
Chess
Design
Gaming
Hans Niemann
Ian Nepomniachtchi
Magnus Carlsen
Sports
TV Shows
Video
Vladimir Kramnik

Chess Twitter Logs On, Immediately Regrets It

20 Apr
19:50
3 min
A light Twitter exchange about a Magnus Carlsen stat turns into a lecture on propaganda, trust, and the soul of modern chess.

It started, as these things always do now, with a stat. “8 moves in. Carlsen at 99% accuracy,” posted @TakeTakeTakeApp, the chaos concierge of chess Twitter.

https://x.com/anishgiri/status/1913907875061096483 (https://x.com/anishgiri/status/1913907875061096483)

Anish Giri — Grandmaster, Dutch #1, and widely regarded as the driest man alive in a good way — quote-tweeted it with a light jab:
“Glad @VBkramnik is there to witness this feat in person!”

If you know, you know. If you don’t, here’s the summary: Vladimir Kramnik, former World Champion and current online fair-play watchdog, has spent the past year warning anyone who will listen that elite chess is starting to look… suspicious. As in: disturbingly engine-like. He’s not naming names, but he’s also not not naming names.

So Giri’s tweet? A well-placed nudge. Not hostile.

But Kramnik does not do nudges. He replies with what might best be described as a gentle manifesto:

“The mafia constantly repeating this ‘joke’ for over a year… cheap PR tricks… fooling their major audience who doesn’t have a clue…”

And just like that, we’re off.

Except it’s not a fight. It’s something more interesting: a subtle, increasingly public disagreement about what the chess world is even looking at anymore.

On one side: Giri, who doesn’t deny that cheating exists, but seems more concerned with how narratives are being spun and who gets to spin them. His casual follow-up? That no one — mafia or anti-mafia — has bothered explaining why the Paris event was quietly pulled.

On the other: Kramnik, who sees the very structure of the game being eroded by statistics like “99% accuracy” being used without nuance or context. To him, this isn’t just a number — it’s the PR arm of a larger campaign to normalize play that no longer looks human.

Both are right.

The 99% stat is almost meaningless without context (early openings are memorized, everyone calm down). But Kramnik’s not hallucinating either — trust in fair play has taken some real dents, and the chess world hasn’t exactly been transparent about how it’s handling them.

So what looked like a throwaway tweet turned into a Rorschach test:
Giri saw spin. Kramnik saw rot. And the fans, once again, were left watching two top players gesture at a much deeper conversation that no one wants to actually have out loud.

Editor’s Note: World Chess will be launching a dedicated media project later this year. In the meantime, we’ll be publishing select stories, commentary, and dispatches right here. Stay tuned.